Catherine Belsey stated that “there is no practice without theory”. I agree with Belsey because all art and design has a purpose or a concept behind it. All of my work has a concept, a response to an issue. I think this is what makes art art; it gives it meaning, purpose, a way for the audience to understand it. Even the things we take for granted, things we aren’t consciously aware of have a theory behind them.
Roland Barthes, the French literary theorist, talks about how children are “a homunculus”, a “microcosm of the adult world”. It explains that children are a smallest version of man. He goes on to talk about how children’s toys are “constituted by myths r techniques of modern adult life” meaning that these toys portray everyday jobs and systems of the modern man including:
- Transport (trains, cars, trunks and buses)
“These toys show what adults find not unusual, war, ugliness etc.”.
Even today young girls are unconsciously shown how to rear a baby with the new babydoll’s which urinate, cried and can even be fed. So many children have these toys and yet they are told not to get pregnant at a young age and to always use protection? This is contradictory don’t you think? I understand that girls may need help/guidance when it comes to having a baby but from such a young age? No. Times have change, society has change from the ideology that woman are baby makers.
Anyway, back on topic, all of the toys we play with as a child in the modern society, are replicas of issues with deal with as adults. We give our children toy soldiers, plastic guns and town builds with burning buildings and destruction. Is this a way of showing young people what normality is in our world? Or are we even conscious of the fact that this is what they are exposed to?
I feel more research on the matter is needed and the opinions of other theorists to develop my own opinion.